Найс!
-
Новые темы в этом разделе публикуются автоматически при добавлении файла в менеджер ресурсов.
Ручное создание новых тем невозможно.
Иконка ресурса
L2ClientDat C# 2.1
- Автор темы Medival
- Дата начала
AlhimN1
Местный житель
оффтоп
обидел чувства верующих?)
ладно.
кто бы рассказал)
обидел чувства верующих?)
ладно.
люблю такие истории)автор как раз выше тебя и отписался
--
а то что у мобиуса - это на основе декомпила старой версии, которую слил в шару один нехороший человек
декомпила и в дальнейшем приписывания авторства себе.
кто бы рассказал)
Оффтоп. Обидел чувства чувствующих)
хз чего ты так среагировал, ну той картинкой что была, но Test реально автор оригинальной версии L2ClientDat, на основе декомпила которой мобиус и сделал свою версию, понапихав там везде свои копирайты и т.д., чтобы сложилось ощущение что это именно он автор и никто более.
Скрытый текст для пользователей: AlhimN1
AlhimN1
Местный житель
не ну ет я понял, что он пилил какой то редактора и а тот слил в шару и тд
но он везде по этому поводу хейтит того мобиуса, хотя тот просто сделал шару декомпила... ну даже не знаю... чёт как то это....
уже скок лет то прошло, а он всё за рыбу гроши))
так в чем хейт то? Я не против что он пилит я написал что он удалил все копирайты и делает вид что это его работа.
С сборкой он так же сделал взял l2junity и везде ренейм сделал на мобиус.
Опа, а я и не знал) вот жеж мобиус редиска) он кст обиделся на то, что его тут вором кличут и закрыл у себя на сайте поддержку программы L2ClientDat оставив ссылки на этот форум - типа ребята идите качайте там, а он больше ничего в шару не выложит)
Так как он делал, особенно новые структуры, лучше бы и не делал вовсе)
В новой версии L2ClientDat-LA2P вырежу все копирайты на мобиуса)))
I just hear people talking and talking, but nobody actually does anything.
A guy takes a dead app, does everyone a favor by updating it and releasing the source code, and somehow he's a thief? The app was unusable; not only did he fix everything, but he also made plenty of improvements.
They complain, yet nobody does it better... the thing is, for better or worse, there used to be a ClientDat. Now there's nothing, because there isn't a single 100% functional ClientDat for any chronicle—only closed-source or Russian versions. But apparently, everyone is perfectly happy paying 100 or 200 euros for a piece-of-shit app.
And even the paid ones aren't 100% perfect.
The very people who complain are the first ones to download whatever Mobius puts out—that's the reality.
A guy takes a dead app, does everyone a favor by updating it and releasing the source code, and somehow he's a thief? The app was unusable; not only did he fix everything, but he also made plenty of improvements.
They complain, yet nobody does it better... the thing is, for better or worse, there used to be a ClientDat. Now there's nothing, because there isn't a single 100% functional ClientDat for any chronicle—only closed-source or Russian versions. But apparently, everyone is perfectly happy paying 100 or 200 euros for a piece-of-shit app.
And even the paid ones aren't 100% perfect.
The very people who complain are the first ones to download whatever Mobius puts out—that's the reality.
The general complaint against Mobius is that he essentially took full credit for the code, which was basically written by a completely different person.
It’s one thing to take someone’s code and continue to develop it, while not forgetting to mention on the basis of whose code it was made, and it’s a completely different thing when all references to the original author are cut out and the impression is created as much as possible that it was all written by Mobius.
If he, as he should have, mentioned in the copyright and in “About the program” what was taken as the basis and who is the author of the original code, then there would not be such claims against him.
The current situation with the program cannot be called anything other than code theft.
The story I know is quite different from that... and yes, I’ve been following the behind-the-scenes scene for a very, very long time.
As far as I know, the creator of the original app is unknown... and the app wasn't open source and had been abandoned.
As far as I know, the creator of the original app is unknown... and the app wasn't open source and had been abandoned.
The author has been known for a long time.
What can I say, if my memory serves me correctly, then even in the title of the leaked version there is a mention of the original author’s server, and with at least a little effort, it would be possible to quickly find out who exactly wrote all this.
I think Mobius was written more than once about the original author of the program, but he chose to ignore it and continue to impersonate the original author.
When on this forum they began to write the truth about who the author really is, then instead of admitting his mistakes, he chose to pretend that he was offended by the alleged slander against him and made us out to be the culprits.
Well, the original author of the program did not abandon its development and is still updating it. But of course it is not in the public domain and prefers to give it to a small number of people so that the same situation does not happen again.
Последнее редактирование:
Yeah, right—that mysterious app that hasn't seen a new version in years...
Yet the author himself never showed up to defend the project; I don't know why, but does that seem strange to anyone else?
Until he shows up and gives his side of the story, I prefer to believe that a handful of people caused the development of one of the few apps that actually worked well to be halted.
And I’ll say it again: everything out there today is just a forks of that program everyone hates—much like that emulator everyone badmouths but still uses.
Yet the author himself never showed up to defend the project; I don't know why, but does that seem strange to anyone else?
Until he shows up and gives his side of the story, I prefer to believe that a handful of people caused the development of one of the few apps that actually worked well to be halted.
And I’ll say it again: everything out there today is just a forks of that program everyone hates—much like that emulator everyone badmouths but still uses.
Apparently you didn’t read the messages in this thread carefully - the author here has already left his opinion about all this.
He is not against someone developing a fork of the program. He doesn’t like the situation with the fact that Mobius essentially took full credit for himself.
Декомпиляция и внесение изменений в код вроде у нас вроде не запрещены, если это сделано не в целях получения выгоды и/или не приносит ущерб владельцу прав на софт (автору/распостранителю).
А вот присвоение авторства и все такое - это да, как раз 146 статья
А вот присвоение авторства и все такое - это да, как раз 146 статья
